Our Comprehensive BA/BE Services
Globaxa provides end-to-end support for bioavailability and bioequivalence studies, managing every aspect from initial concept through final regulatory submission. Our integrated approach ensures seamless coordination across all study phases while maintaining the highest standards of scientific rigor and regulatory compliance. We work closely with pharmaceutical sponsors to understand their specific requirements, timelines, and budget constraints, developing customized solutions that optimize study design while minimizing risk and maximizing the probability of successful outcomes.
Our service portfolio encompasses strategic study planning, where our experienced team evaluates the drug substance characteristics, formulation properties, and regulatory requirements to design optimal study protocols. We conduct thorough feasibility assessments considering factors such as drug half-life, expected variability, subject safety considerations, and analytical method requirements. This upfront planning phase is crucial for identifying potential challenges and implementing appropriate mitigation strategies before study initiation.
Strategic Protocol Development and Regulatory Alignment
The foundation of any successful BA/BE study lies in a well-designed protocol that addresses all scientific, regulatory, and operational requirements. Our protocol development process begins with a comprehensive review of available data on the drug substance, including its pharmacokinetic properties, therapeutic window, known drug interactions, and any special considerations related to food effects or formulation-dependent absorption. We analyze regulatory guidance documents from relevant authorities including the FDA, EMA, WHO, and country-specific agencies to ensure the protocol design meets or exceeds all applicable requirements.
Study design selection represents a critical decision point that impacts study feasibility, statistical power, and overall success probability. For most oral solid dosage forms with relatively short elimination half-lives, we typically recommend randomized, two-period, two-sequence crossover designs that allow each subject to serve as their own control, thereby reducing variability and required sample sizes. However, certain situations may warrant alternative designs such as parallel studies for drugs with very long half-lives, replicate designs for highly variable drug products, or multiple-dose steady-state studies for modified-release formulations.
Sample size determination requires careful consideration of expected within-subject variability, regulatory acceptance criteria, and desired statistical power. We employ sophisticated statistical methods to calculate appropriate sample sizes that provide adequate power to demonstrate bioequivalence while accounting for potential subject dropouts. For highly variable drugs where intra-subject coefficient of variation exceeds certain thresholds, we design replicate studies that allow for expanded acceptance criteria or reference-scaled average bioequivalence approaches as permitted by regulatory guidelines.